As the NFL Draft approaches, fans, analysts, and teams are inundated with mock drafts—speculative predictions of which players will be selected by which teams, in what order. These exercises dominate sports media, fueling debates and shaping expectations. While they can be fun to play around with and they give sportswriters something to fill the void — with all the hype, noise, and nonsense, one question persists: Are NFL mock drafts ever accurate? The answer is complex, hinging on the nature of the draft, the expertise behind the mocks, and the unpredictable human elements at play.
The Purpose of Mock Drafts
Mock drafts aren’t just fan fodder; they serve multiple purposes. For analysts, they’re a way to showcase knowledge of prospects, team needs, and draft trends. For fans, they’re a source of excitement and speculation. For teams, they can offer insight into how the draft might unfold, aiding strategic planning. However, their primary role is predictive, and that’s where accuracy becomes a sticking point.
Measuring Accuracy
To assess mock draft accuracy, we need to define what “accurate” means. Is it correctly predicting the exact player-team pairing in the exact draft slot? Or is it about identifying the general range where a player might be selected? Most evaluations focus on the former—specific player-team matches—because that’s the standard mock drafts set for themselves.
Historically, mock drafts struggle to achieve high accuracy. A 2015 study by Football Perspective analyzed 15 prominent mock drafts from 2005 to 2014 and found that, on average, only about 4.7 first-round picks per year (out of 32) were correctly predicted in terms of player, team, and exact slot. That’s roughly a 15% accuracy rate. More recent analyses, like one from Pro Football Network in 2023, showed similar results, with top mock drafters like ESPN’s Mel Kiper Jr. and NFL Network’s Daniel Jeremiah averaging 5-7 correct first-round picks.
Even the best mock drafts rarely exceed 20-25% accuracy for exact matches. For example, in the 2024 NFL Draft, The Athletic’s Dane Brugler, widely regarded as one of the sharpest draft analysts, correctly predicted only 6 of 32 first-round selections. This isn’t a knock on Brugler’s expertise but a reflection of the draft’s inherent unpredictability.
Why Are Mock Drafts So Hard to Get Right?
Several factors make pinpoint accuracy elusive:
- Team Secrecy and Misinformation: NFL teams guard their draft intentions closely, often leaking false information to manipulate perceptions. This “smokescreen” tactic can mislead analysts. For instance, in 2021, the San Francisco 49ers’ trade-up to the No. 3 pick sparked widespread speculation about Mac Jones, but they ultimately selected Trey Lance, catching many mock drafters off guard.
- Trades Disrupt Predictions: Draft-day trades are common and can upend mock drafts. In 2024, six first-round trades reshuffled the board, making it nearly impossible for mocks to stay accurate beyond the first few picks. Mock drafts rarely account for trades due to their speculative nature, which limits their precision.
- Subjective Team Preferences: Teams weigh players differently based on scheme fit, medical evaluations, and intangibles like character. Analysts can’t access private team interviews or medical reports, so they’re often guessing how teams prioritize prospects. The 2023 draft saw the Houston Texans surprise many by trading up to No. 3 for Will Anderson Jr., a move few mocks anticipated.
- The Butterfly Effect: One unexpected pick early in the draft can trigger a cascade of changes. If a team takes a quarterback earlier than expected, it can shift the entire draft landscape, rendering later predictions obsolete.
- Volume of Variables: With 32 teams, hundreds of prospects, and countless team-specific factors (coaching changes, roster needs, draft philosophies), the permutations are staggering. Even the most informed analysts are working with incomplete data.
When Are Mock Drafts More Accurate?
While exact player-team-slot predictions are tough, mock drafts fare better in certain contexts:
- Top Picks: The No. 1 overall pick is often the easiest to predict, especially when a generational talent like Andrew Luck (2012) or Trevor Lawrence (2021) is available. In 2024, nearly every mock correctly pegged USC’s Caleb Williams as the Chicago Bears’ top choice.
- Positional Trends: Mocks are better at forecasting positional runs than specific players. For example, analysts often accurately predict when a draft will see a surge of quarterbacks or offensive linemen based on team needs and prospect quality. In 2024, mocks widely anticipated a quarterback-heavy top 10, and six QBs went in the first 12 picks.
- Player Range: Mocks are more reliable at predicting the general range where a player will be drafted (e.g., top 10, mid-first round) than the exact team. A 2022 study by SB Nation found that top analysts correctly placed about 60% of first-round prospects within a 10-pick range of their actual slot.
- Late-Season Mocks: Mocks released closer to the draft, after the NFL Combine, pro days, and pre-draft visits, tend to be more accurate. By late April, analysts have more data on team preferences and prospect stock. For instance, Daniel Jeremiah’s final 2024 mock was more accurate than his January version, reflecting updated information.
The Value Beyond Accuracy
Even if mock drafts rarely nail exact picks, they’re far from useless. They provide a framework for understanding team needs, prospect rankings, and draft dynamics. They educate fans about lesser-known players and spark discussions about strategy. For example, a mock draft might highlight a team’s need for a cornerback, prompting fans to research prospects such as Alabama’s Kool-Aid McKinstry.
Moreover, mock drafts are a snapshot of the pre-draft consensus. They reflect the collective wisdom of analysts, scouts, and insiders, even if that wisdom is imperfect. When a mock draft “misses,” it often reveals fascinating insights about what analysts misread or how teams defied expectations. The 2019 draft, where the Raiders shocked the world by taking Clelin Ferrell at No. 4, is a case study in how mocks can miss but still fuel valuable post-draft analysis.
Can Accuracy Improve?
Advances in data analytics and access to information have made mock drafts marginally more accurate over time. Tools like Pro Football Focus’s draft simulators and machine-learning models can crunch historical data to predict trends. However, the human element—team decisions, last-minute trades, and gut-driven picks—ensures mock drafts will never be foolproof.
Some analysts have experimented with “scenario-based” mocks, offering multiple versions based on potential trades or surprises. Others focus on “big-picture” predictions, like positional runs or sleeper picks, rather than exact slots. These approaches sacrifice specificity for broader accuracy, but they’re still at the mercy of the draft’s chaos.
Final Thoughts
NFL mock drafts are rarely accurate in the strictest sense—correctly matching players to teams and slots is a Herculean task given the draft’s unpredictability. Yet, their value lies in their ability to inform, entertain, and frame the draft conversation. They’re less about being “right” and more about preparing fans and analysts for the myriad possibilities. So, the next time you read a mock draft, enjoy it for what it is: an educated guess in a game where no one, not even NFL GMs, has all the answers. Meanwhile, I am going to start my next mock draft, based on my mood this afternoon 🙂
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.